The Frozen Lens of Madness: A Review of Monster: The Ed Gein Story By Matt Kowalski | Kowala Media

The Frozen Lens of Madness: A Review of Monster: The Ed Gein Story By Matt Kowalski | Kowala Media

By Matt Kowalski | Kowala Media

 

When Monster: The Ed Gein Story dropped on Netflix, it arrived wrapped in familiar dread. Ed Gein — the reclusive Wisconsin grave-robber whose crimes inspired Psycho, The Texas Chainsaw Massacre, and The Silence of the Lambs — has long stood as a grotesque mirror of American horror. But this latest dramatization feels less like a horror series and more like a meditation on what makes America itself so drawn to the macabre. It’s equal parts elegy, cultural diagnosis, and visual hallucination.

Across its eight episodes, the series wrestles with an impossible duality: is it chronicling a monster, or building a requiem for one?

 

6405967

The Cold Geometry of Memory

From the opening frames, Monster establishes winter not as a backdrop, but as a state of mind. The filmmakers use snow the way Tarkovsky used rain — not for beauty, but for meaning. Every flake falls heavy with silence. Every drift hides the dead. Wisconsin becomes a psychic Siberia, a space of exile where morality and sanity freeze over.

The cinematography deliberately rejects warmth. Interiors are lit like morgues, all sodium lamps and low-key amber that spill over the heavy orange woodwork of a bygone Midwest — the kind of sanitarium architecture you’d expect in Anoka County in the 1940s. The aesthetic feels unsettlingly authentic, right down to the white uniforms and varnished trim, evoking the historical asylums of Minnesota and Wisconsin where America stored its forgotten.

Yet what’s most haunting is how the camera itself seems ill. The lenses bend the world — literally. The series makes striking use of vintage Russian portrait optics, glass that distorts and swirls the bokeh until straight lines curl inward, as though reality itself were collapsing under the weight of Gein’s delusions. It’s the same optical language Tarkovsky used in Mirror and Stalker — a spiritual warp, not a technical one.

In one devastating sequence, Adeline — Ed’s would-be companion — becomes the lens’s subject as the background buckles around her. The moment he tries to introduce her to his dead mother is rendered through warped focus, an optical metaphor for the breach between the living and the dead. The lens isn’t just filming madness; it’s participating in it.


1000049968

The Russian Connection

The series’ uncanny resemblance to Soviet cinema goes deeper than style. Many of the visual effects and post-production credits belong to Eastern European studios in Prague and Saint Petersburg. You can see it in the texture — the pallid, otherworldly light, the slow pans, the near-static compositions that feel more Tarkovsky than True Crime. The winters don’t look like Wisconsin winters; they look like purgatory.

That choice makes sense. In Tarkovsky’s films, weather is divine judgment — nature’s way of externalizing the soul’s decay. Here, snow becomes the mind’s final stage, burying Ed in the stillness of his own unreality. The frozen barns, the skeletal trees, the desolate plains — it’s like Doctor Zhivago by way of Silence of the Lambs, with madness in place of romance.

Screenshot 2025-10-04 at 8.01.10 PM

Monster and the American Myth

But the series isn’t only about Ed Gein — it’s about the America that made him. Halfway through the series, we begin to sense that Gein’s story is being woven into the fabric of postwar American paranoia: the crumbling small town, the religious repression, and the rise of the suburban nightmare. The filmmaker even juxtaposes Ed’s hospital life with Nixon-era austerity — a metaphor for institutional decay. The viewer is left wondering whether Ed’s personal descent mirrors a broader cultural one.

In a way, Monster becomes a self-reflective study on the industrialization of horror. Gein, a man who desecrated the dead, is now commodified endlessly by Hollywood. His crimes are the blueprint for some of the most iconic horror films ever made:

Psycho (Norman Bates and the mother fixation)
The Texas Chainsaw Massacre (Leatherface and the flesh motif)
The Silence of the Lambs (Buffalo Bill and the transmutation of identity)

Each film borrowed Gein’s pathology and transformed it into art — into money, into myth. The Netflix series understands this and doubles down on the meta-reference. We are not only watching Ed Gein; we’re watching the cinematic ghost of his influence haunting itself.

Screenshot 2025-10-04 at 8.29.44 PM

Humanizing the Inhuman

Perhaps the most daring — and divisive — element of Monster is its portrayal of Gein’s mental illness. By the final episodes, it’s clear that he’s not a calculating serial killer in the modern sense, but a man trapped in schizophrenia or dissociative psychosis. He seems not to remember, not to understand, and his detachment from reality is treated almost with pity.

The show flirts with empathy but never collapses into sympathy. It humanizes without forgiving. The viewer is left in a liminal state — repulsed yet riveted, aware that what’s unfolding is both monstrous and pathetically human.

The Guardian captured this duality best:
“It panders to viewers’ basest instincts by lingering gleefully over the worst depredations humanity can commit.”

And yet, that same indulgence is what gives the series its edge. It dares to stare too long — not just at Ed, but at us, the audience who keep resurrecting him.

960x0.jpg

The True Crime Feedback Loop

No modern studio has turned moral obsession into a business model quite like Netflix. The streamer’s fixation with interrogations, confessionals, and posthumous psychology has become its own genre — a kind of digital séance. Mindhunter set the template: two FBI agents staring into the abyss, trying to classify evil while Netflix sold us the spectacle of it. Then came the parade — Dahmer, Bundy Tapes, Night Stalker, Conversations with a Killer. Each promised understanding; each fed the same hunger.

Monster: The Ed Gein Story inherits this impulse but filters it through a warped lens — literally and thematically. It wears the posture of an art film: Russian optics, Tarkovskian snowfall, long silences, schizophrenic reality shifts. But beneath the avant-garde surface, it’s still participating in the ritual of serial killer resurrection.

By the midpoint of the series, the viewer even gets a faint whiff of Mindhunter’s connective logic: detectives tracing Gein’s pathology forward into later decades, hinting that his crimes may have informed or even inspired later figures like Ted Bundy. It’s speculative, cinematic, and morally queasy — the kind of psychological cross-pollination that Netflix can’t resist.

There was a minor uproar after Mindhunter ended — many fans complained that the show never got to Bundy, as if the cultural catalog of killers needed completing. Monster seems aware of that appetite and plays to it subtly, feeding us the idea of lineage — that Gein begat the modern American monster.

And here’s the dark trick: by inviting us into his isolation, into his delusions, into the frostbitten landscape of his mind, Monster turns empathy into complicity. We begin to understand him too well. The longer we watch, the more we see the world through Ed’s fractured lens — and the less shocked we feel.

That’s the quiet horror of Netflix’s true crime machine: it doesn’t just dramatize atrocity, it normalizes intimacy with it. We’re not asked to look away. We’re asked to stay, analyze, empathize, binge.

And when the snow finally covers everything — the crimes, the guilt, the outrage — what’s left is a mirror. One that shows not Ed Gein, not Bundy, not the killers who made horror famous, but the audience who keeps pressing play.

AAAABfCK-eJ9ycs_lFXaYy3IUUchYrCmkvWOHYbLZ_nv7W7t4clkw3UV04RBRscPXlK6esrQEXd_xVBvh6DglEBeMG6_D-qXjpldzFOg

Conclusion: A Cinematic Requiem in the Snow

Monster: The Ed Gein Story is not perfect — it teeters between introspection and exploitation, sometimes stumbling into melodrama. But it’s undeniably crafted with visual intelligence. The winter is real, the silence is earned, and the camera’s sickness is poetic.

For all its flaws, it achieves something rare: it makes American horror feel foreign again. Like watching your own reflection through frosted glass — distorted, distant, and coldly beautiful.

If Tarkovsky had ever turned his camera toward the Midwest, this might have been the result: a slow, mournful descent into the mind of a man — and a nation — that lost its bearings in the snow.

A picture of the sky with the word " enditall " written in it.

enditall – “toska” by Kowala Media

filmed and edited by Matt Kowalski via Kowala Media in Osceola, Wisconsin

Shot on location in the woods and in an Osceola garage

Filmed in 4k

Sony A7siii 12-24mm 2.8 Sony G

24mm probe lens

Rhino traveler pro slider

Panasonic s1h 24mm-105mm 4.0 Canon

24-70mm 2.8 Canon

70-200mm Canon

Tripod by Sachtler

filmed and edited by Kowala Media in Osceola, Wisconsin

produced by Royalty Holding Company executive producer: Travis Johnson

cinematography and editing by Matt Kowalski

music and lyrics written by Zander Ness

audio recorded and mixed by Neal Stein and Zander Ness

all rights reserved

www.enditallofficial.bandcamp.com

www.facebook.com/enditallofficial

www.instagram.com/enditallofficial

kowalamedia.com

"Great big washy cymbals in the mix..." "Grungy and dirty in the guitars I really enjoy it these guys are cool..." "They

pull off what they're going for depressive, dark, grungy blackened music, it's not black metal but it has a blackened

edge to it for sure..." "Jangily guitars that sound great which means you can hear the bass in the mix the the whole time!"

#UnsignedShocase #Certified https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQSqp...

 

A person holding a small fish in their hands.

Goldfish Invasion in Minnesota Big Woods Lake

Goldfish Invasion in Minnesota Big Woods Lake

Chaska, MN

The Big Woods Lake in Chaska, Minnesota, has become overrun with goldfish, impacting heavily on the environment for native fish.

 

The goldfish have been outnumbering the native fish species and altering the lakebeds and the water clarity.

 

Local environmental scientists and spokespeople for the county urged residents not to dispose of their fish by releasing them into the wild.

 

"We want to encourage people, if they have an aquarium pet they can no longer take care of, or they don't want, to find it a new home that can include going to your local veterinarian, finding a pet store and talking to them, contacting a local aquarium society, but essentially trying to rehome it, and not release it into the wild," Carver County communications representative Madeline Seveland said.

 

Environmental scientists have been tagging the fish with microchips to keep track of the numbers and analyse migration patterns. The team reckons they catch between "400-500" per day, according to environmental scientist Jordan Wein.

 

Local scientists reportedly removed over 100,000 goldfish from the area last year in a bit to allow the environment and vegetation to recover.

 

-Video Produced by Matt Kowalski @KowalaMedia

-Written Copy by Buckshot Allen via @RuptlyNews

A man in striped shirt sitting down looking at the camera.

Questions in the death of Terrance Franklin

The following is an article from the plaintiffs investigator R. Steven Rogers regarding the facts in the death of Terrance Franklin. Steve worked a civil suit on behalf of the family with Attorney Mike Padden author of The Minneapolis Police Department:  Blue Code of Silence: The True Story of the Terrance Franklin Murder

County attorney Mike Freeman has written to the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension and has formerly requested their involvement in a new independent investigation.

 

Kowala Media has acquired the permission of the author in this articles publication.

I was recently featured in the Time magazine article ‘“Minneapolis Police Were Cleared in the 2013 Killing of Terrance Franklin. A Video Complicates the Story-and Now the Case May be Reopened”.  This feature highlights the work of Attorney Mike Padden and myself on the civil suit that Mr. Padden filed on behalf of the Franklin family after the death of their son, Terrance Franklin, at the hands of the Minneapolis Police on May 10, 2013.

In the days following the publication by Time of the article and documentary video, several questions have arisen in my mind based on my knowledge of the case.

The Time article was the first public mention of the letter by Hennepin County Attorney Mike Freeman’s office to the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension requesting an independent examination of the case. Freeman stated that “A key piece of evidence brought by the Plaintiffs in the civil suit is a recording by Jimmy Gaines.” This is correct to a degree, as the Minneapolis Police appear to have had the video within a week of the shooting. Our team did, however, obtain the full quality original from Mr. Gaines and submitted that into evidence later.

Notably, the file from the Minneapolis Police we received in the discovery process presumably was downloaded from YouTube, as the police never contacted Mr. Gaines who took the video, the file size matches the known compression ratio that is used when uploading to YouTube, and it was not known to be anywhere else at that time. (I compared the file obtained from the Minneapolis Police to the file gathered by our team from Mr. Gaines’ device that originally recorded it and the file size was about 7% of the original.)

Freeman also mentions in his letter that Mr. Gaines posted the video on YouTube and that the MPD never interviewed him about the video. When he became aware of this is unknown but is certainly relevant.

Freeman also told Minneapolis Public Radio that they had reviewed new evidence “that was not available to us at the time we took the case to the Grand Jury.” This statement is compelling to me and raises some serious questions.

The only way I can see that it is possible, with the information available, that the video was not available to the Grand Jury  is if one or more of the following is true :

1 : The MPD did not provide it to Freeman with the other evidence when Freeman decided to convene the Grand Jury. It is a reasonable assumption that the MPD would turn over all evidence to the County Attorney’s office when the decision to convene a Grand Jury was reached. I am not sure on the requirements here, but it’s possible there are some; or,

2 : For some reason due diligence was not done by the County Attorney’s office in looking at what evidence to provide the Grand Jury; or,

3 : The County Attorney’s office for some reason chose not to include the video in the evidence given to the Grand Jury (noting, of course, that they do have complete discretion as to what evidence is given to the Grand Jury.)

Of the first two, this would also raise the question if this case was on the radar at the County Attorney’s office at the time of the press conference on May 30, 2013. It certainly was on the radar at the MPD, as The Chief of Police issued this statement to WCCO that day (which was read aloud at the press conference), “If you have video of events from the scene, I request that you turn it over to me as it is evidence in an active investigation.”  At that press conference, Mr. Padden even remarked that, for all he knew, the MPD may have enhanced the sound already.

Here’s the timeline:

Now, as Mr. Gaines was never contacted by the County Attorney to testify before the Grand Jury, we know the video could not have been used by the Grand Jury, as Mr. Gaines would have needed to testify to lay foundation, which in non-lawyerese means they could not use it without him attesting that he took the video, and where and when it was taken.

While many media outlets are reporting that this is new evidence, I believe the information presented here in this article shows that it is not. Ironically, Fred Bruno, an attorney for Lucas Peterson came out today in a statement saying “The Gaines video was well known to and vetted by Freeman’s office long before the Grand Jury ruled in September 2013,” and “There is no new evidence, only newly procured opinions and shifting politics.”

The problem I have with this is no evidence was presented to support this statement, and at no time during this case, nor in my searches after for this article and other media interviews, have I found a single indicator that Mr. Freeman was aware of or in possession of this key piece of evidence.

Working backwards on the timeline, as we know the Grand Jury was not aware of this recording, we must ask where the system failed. Clearly it failed not only Terrance Franklin, but all of us.

A flag flying over the top of a building.

“June 1st businesses across the state will reopen en masse,” says ReOpenMN Coalition

For Immediate Release: 5-26-20

Press Contact info:  Paul Anderson https://m.facebook.com/ReOpenMNCoalition/?

 

In the wake of Minnesota Governor Tim Walz's shelter-in-place order several groups formed on social media to take political action against what they saw as a violation of their Constitutionally protected rights.

In late May a large meeting was held by the owners of several businesses worried about their livelihoods to discuss reopening efforts in defiance of the governor's orders.

Recognizing the growing desire to open their businesses in a coordinated fashion, several of these social media groups came together in a combined effort, calling themselves "The ReOpen MN Coalition".

The group's Facebook page states, "This has gone on long enough. It’s time for Minnesota to get back to work. We’ve all done our part and flattened the curve. We’re ready. Now it’s time to open back up before everything we cherish is destroyed. Minnesota’s unique culture—the bars, restaurants, resorts, campgrounds, gyms, small businesses that make our communities unique are disappearing."

The groups post continued, "Let’s stop the carnage. On June 1 businesses across the state will reopen en masse. There is safety in numbers. We are collecting the names of businesses ready to reopen safely and will announce their reopening on Sunday, May 31 so customers can find and patronize them. If you want your business added to the list, sign up here: http://tiny.cc/reopenMN"

"We've seen businesses publicly announce their plans to reopen and even though local law enforcement is not shutting these places down in many cases, the Attorney General of Minnesota has taken it upon himself to threaten these business owners personally. We're keeping their names secret until the last possible minute, when people in the community will find out anyway."  Paul Anderson a spokesperson for the group stated.

The groups plan is to support and organize these businesses in preparation for a June 1st statewide reopening. The coalition plans to keep participating businesses secret until the day before they open. They have set up a Facebook page and a Go Fund me account to support this effort.

https://m.facebook.com/ReOpenMNCoalition/?

 

A group of people sitting around drinking wine.

9 to 5 Revisited by Anna Purrington

In the film world there are workplace comedies and there’s 9 to 5. Written in 1980 by Patricia Resnick and directed by Colin Higgins, 9 to 5 is a film that gets everything right: the laughs are smart, the cast is perfect, and hey, that song, right?

 

One of my parents picked this out at a video store’s liquidation sale in the late eighties and I fondly remember watching it on our beta for probably a straight year with my brother and best friend where we delighted in memorizing Violet Newstead’s lines and reciting them to each other in everyday moments of life (“Thanks, Ros, I know just where to stick it”). We may or may not still do this. In fact, I may or may not be able to recite the entire film from start to finish.

 

In any event, this is a throwback with some serious staying power. The story begins with Judy Bernly (Jane Fonda) arriving for her first day at a busy corporate office; Violet Newstead (Lily Tomlin) is the supervisor charged with training her. Violet is a twelve-year company veteran, Judy, a recently-divorced housewife, but they easily connect over the work, which employees are gossips, and the truth about their boss, Franklin Hart (Dabney Coleman), a semi-competent vice president but disgusting human being.

 

When he’s not taking credit for Violet’s ideas or explaining the greater points of men’s superiority in areas of teamwork or dealing with numbers, Hart is setting up disgusting schemes to sexually harass his secretary, Doralee Rhodes (Dolly Parton), who is shunned by the rest of the office. When Hart finally crosses the line with each woman--giving away Violet’s promotion, admitting he’s been spreading rumors about Doralee, and firing one of Judy’s friends--the three get together and bond over fantasies of serving Hart some payback and taking him out.

 

When Violet mistakenly seasons Hart’s coffee with rat poison (the same method she’d used in the fantasy the night before) and he’s taken to the hospital, the women eventually find out just how far they’re willing to go to defend each other and how maybe, they might be able to do Hart’s job better without him. Throughout all the action, some of it serious like gunfire and car chases, the comedy takes a few different forms. Tomlin as Violet is full of wit and one-liners; her exchanges with office employees range from sarcastic to all-out snappy, but she’s also not above making sentimental comments about cartoons or singing the praises of her son’s marijuana.

 

There are nice bits of physical comedy that usually focus on Hart tripping or flinging objects around or the entirety of each woman’s “kill fantasy” as imaginary Hart tries to wiggle his way out of justice (Doralee’s hog-tie comes immediately to mind, which she performs brilliantly), and Judy gets some pretty major mileage out of the sexist egotistical lying hypocritical bigot reference, but underscoring all this funny business is the persistent idea that Hart is offensive and vile.

 

The message is that he’s getting his comeuppance, but he’s too much of a jerk to even see it. Late in the film, when the unrepentant Hart realizes he’s been outsmarted he asks, “Don’t you think I might be missed at the office?” Our ladies don’t answer, but they don’t really need to, do they?

 

By Anna Purrington

A man with a gun in his hand is looking out of the window.

Rear Window: A Modern Reflection? by Anna Purrington #KowalaCinemaThrowback

Submitted to a nation of stir-crazy people confined to their homes I give you Rear Window, a story of a stir-crazy man, also confined to his home. This guy is crabby, he’s bored, and he’s sick of being in his apartment until one of his neighbors inadvertently provides him with something to do--solve a murder! Is this simply a straight-forward suspense story? A cautionary tale of men versus women, the old school versus modernity? Nearly anything goes in terms of defining what it all means, but if anything positive is to come from our own sheltering at home it should be for all of us stir-crazies to unite in our love of film (and voyeurism). Let’s dig in.

Alfred Hitchcock’s films are a dream to review and discuss because like many auteur directors whose work carries a collection of recognizable properties (almost like a personal seal or thumbprint), Hitchcock puts a ton of interesting elements into every film he does. For example the slowness of the moving camera commonly conveys suspense, the classic composition of shots can portray power or vulnerability, and all the little items that inhabit the setting (in this case, camera lenses, cigarettes, jewelry, and saws) together with the way these items are used go a long way in showing, not telling, some of the important things we need to know about the characters. L.B. Jefferies (James Stewart) is a photographer confined to his apartment having been severely injured at a photo shoot.

His days are scattered with visits from the insurance-appointed nurse, Stella (Thelma Ritter) and his love interest, Lisa (Grace Kelly), but Jefferies seems to be preoccupied with the goings-on of the apartment dwellers across the courtyard, fully on display through open windows. Notable tenants include Ms. Torso, a young, pliable ballerina, Ms. Lonely-Heart, a heavy drinker who imagines interactions with beaus, a party-throwing songwriter and pianist, and the Thorwalds, a man who lives with his wife, also confined to her room. Jeffries becomes suspicious when Mrs. Thorwald suddenly disappears, and after noticing several occasions of strange behavior from Mr. Thorwald, Jefferies decides the man must have murdered his wife. Technically speaking, this film is easily an aesthetic masterpiece. A soundstage this massive (three separate apartment dwellings, courtyard, background street, and distant restaurant) is impressive on its own, but the filmmaking techniques, color, and music are all pleasantly memorable. The camera, which serves largely to stretch out scenes or reveal things slowly, is quick and sudden when it needs to be, usually in moments of fear, danger, or measuring Jeffries’ reactions to fear and danger.

Lighting has a huge effect on the story: whose windows are illuminated, how shadows protect or hide Jefferies as he spies, or where Thorwald is and whether or not he’s watching as betrayed by the glow of his cigarette. Color explodes in the summer environment through the flower bed, the choices in paint inside the apartments, and the outfits of the female characters. The musical choices and sound design amplify the interconnectedness of the neighbors through an ongoing accompaniment of piano (courtesy of the musician), vocal scales, folk fiddle, and whistling while also giving way at crucial moments to more sinister elements such as breaking glass, a thunderstorm, and a woman’s scream.

So how does it all come together and what’s being said under the surface events of the story? Questions of impotence and inferiority have been raised (why does Jefferies keep rejecting Lisa, physically?) as well as the play between more traditionally-valued Stella and Detective Doyle who have a stated aversion to psychology versus Jefferies and Lisa, who take a more modern approach to thinking things out and analyzing their feelings. Jefferies speaks at length on what he considers to be barriers to a future marriage with Lisa that really only amount to differences in class and personal interests, but seems to put all his concerns to rest once Lisa begins to take his side in questioning Mrs. Thorwald’s disappearance.

The issue of voyeurism is not exactly subtle in this story; in a precursor to Ira Levin’s Silver as well as reality television proper Rear Window is about a man peeping in on others’ lives. How do we feel about this, and how does it translate to the things we watch today? At a bit of a reach yet still worth mentioning-- Jefferies' perception and treatment of Lisa changes pretty significantly once she leaves his apartment and becomes a player in the events across the courtyard, after she becomes someone to be watched. In school, one of my professors from the West Bank (photography and art history department) preferred to keep discussions on film contained to the narrative and technical arenas, whereas several others on the East Bank (comparative literature and film theory) lived for the discussions of the underlying themes and what it all meant in the scheme of the universe.

This film was a top pick for both camps, but for decidedly different reasons. What are your thoughts? What bank are you on, and why?

 

By Anna Purrington

A large brick building with snow on the ground.

Activists to protest Walz’ peacetime emergency orders

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE April 14, 2020 Contact: Michele Even Phone: 952-277-9114 Email: mnfreedom2018@gmail.com Liberate Minnesota - Reopen Our Lives Credit River Twp, Minn. – Gov. Tim Walz issued an Executive Order on March 13, 2020 declaring a Peacetime Emergency that he just extended into the middle of May. This has effectively put the entire populace in the state on hold that is now destroying our economy and people’s homes along with it.

 

“This overreaction by the governor has gone on long enough and we aren’t going to take it anymore,” Liberate Minnesota organizer, Michele Even, said in a statement. She continued, “All jobs are essential. People need to support themselves and their families. The governor and these legislators need to stop hurting us. We need someone to care about us. Give us our life back!”

 

Liberate Minnesota is seeking to send a message to the governor and legislators by exercising their 1st amendment right to peacefully assemble and use their free speech. “People’s lives are already in turmoil and the cure is worse than the disease at this point,” Michele said. “People are fed up with this lock down and want to get back to their jobs to support themselves and their families. This ‘Stay Home’ order has destroyed homes. Enough is enough!” she concluded. Liberate Minnesota will be holding a 1st Amendment peaceful assembly at the Governor's mansion on April 17, 2020 from 12:00 - 3:00 pm to send a strong message that people have had enough and they’re not going to take it anymore. It’s time to Liberate Minnesota now.

 

A man with glasses and a suit is smiling.

Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Mock the Government by Anna Purrington

Director Stanley Kubrick lets us know immediately the type of film experience we’re getting into with his 1964 satirical comedy, Dr. Strangelove. First, a text crawler at the behest of the US Air Force explaining how the events depicted in the film couldn’t really happen, and second, an extended collection of scenes of an airplane refueling another midair with a decidedly sexual theme.

The effect of this introduction is clear: we are about to see a crude, outlandish mockery of governmental situations. The mockery goes on to take several forms throughout the film, playing often upon character names, generalities of hawks, doves, Russians, and Germans (among many others), and a stubborn obsession over bodily fluids. That said, Dr. Strangelove will not be every person’s kind of comedy.

The Cold War was a very serious situation; not everyone will see the humor in making it ridiculous. Communism and Nazism aren’t light-hearted topics, nor are mutinies, hydrogen bombs, loss of life, or suicide. Kubrick is able to sidestep the seriousness of these issues by focusing not on the issues themselves but rather the poor decisions that led to them.

The theme here isn’t necessarily about the evil men do, it’s about the stupid, the confusing, and the outlandish, and we can feel fine laughing about these things. The narrative, driven by ongoing tension between American and Russia over nuclear weapons superiority (and any ‘gaps’ between the two nations’ perceived might over the other), is fairly straight-forward. An Air Force general goes rogue, sets in motion a nuclear attack on Russia, and the president’s cabinet bumble about trying to thwart the attack while maintaining diplomacy with the Russians. The character Strangelove (one of Peter Sellers’ three roles in the film) is minor but memorable as an advisor to American president, Merkin Muffley (also Sellers). Suggesting previous Nazi association, Strangelove’s behavior involving a maniacal right arm and constant verbal lapses into “Mein Fuhrer” provides not only comedy but tongue-in-cheek stylistic homage to German Expressionist cinema.

The Air Force Base, which sets the story in motion, is initially a very confused environment. General Jack D. Ripper (Sterling Hayden) suddenly ordering a nuclear strike and blathering on about fluids; is this guy for real? Yes, he is, and no, he won’t recall the code he’s just authorized, so a retaliatory attack on his base commences. Here we see the newsreel look of active battle juxtaposed with extended scenes of the Royal Air Force executive officer Lionel Mandrake’s (also Sellers) uncomfortable reactions against the paranoia of General Ripper and later, a comically dim set of interactions with a Colonel “Bat” Guano, a phone booth, and a coke machine.

Arguably the most stylized setting in the film, the War Room is composed of a giant oval table which seats the president’s cabinet and dignitaries and over which hangs an enormous board map of Russia, complete with lights and other strategic features. Size is definitely key, and the board is often acknowledged as a powerful tool that should be kept secret at all costs.

The comedic performances of the war room are dynamic and constant, fluctuating back and forth between the monotone President Muffley and General Buck Turgidson (George C. Scott). Hawkish Turgidson’s character exists to egg on the entire attack, and comes off as both logically stoic and giddy at the prospect of dropping a warhead on a Russian target, but Scott’s portrayal of the general-- tone of voice, facial expressions, and gestures-- steals virtually every scene until Strangelove arrives.

It’s been noted that George C. Scott was not pleased with the performances of his that Kubrick chose to use in the film, but it’s no understatement to say that nonetheless, Scott as Turgidson is a huge part of the film’s success. The B52 plane piloted by Major “King” Kong (Slim Pickens) is the most light-hearted of the settings, and relies on music (When Johnny Comes Marching Home), close shots of the technical aspects of the aircraft and its gear, and Pickens’ gentle western drawl to color the experience of something serious that becomes funny.

Bombs are not funny; dropping a bomb on a country is not funny, but Kong and his crew make it so. The film’s famous conclusion takes this concept a step further by returning sexual innuendo to the final act as Kong rides a warhead out of the plane and onto Russian soil. We are somehow left feeling satisfied with such a resolution simply because the bomb and the entirety of international diplomacy have been treated as jokes, mishandled by a crew of incompetents.

Should politicians and generals be mocked if they’re shown to be incompetent? Kubrick thought so. The book Red Alert upon which the film is based does not take a comic approach to any of the events depicted in the story, but posited two serious thoughts that Kubrick chose to include: “You say, ‘War is too important to be left to the generals?’ Well I say war is too important to be left to the politicians!” Despite such bravado, neither make a very convincing argument in the film, which is clearly what Kubrick set out to show us in the first place.

How might Stanley see things today? I’m not sure I want to know . . .

 

By Anna Purrington

A man writing on the board with a marker

BOMBSHELL – MN Senator Scott Jenson says MDH may be promoting false statistics

During a video posted Tuesday April 7th, Minnesota (R) Senator Scott Jenson stated he had received a 7 page document from the Minnesota Department of Health on the handling of death certificates. He insinuated that the document may promote false statistics by using presumptive cases of COVID-19 on death certificates. Here is a link to that document. and a link to the video.

close

Are you enjoying Kowala Media? If so, please share with your friends!